PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.37%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OR's 7.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
45.76%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 146.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
45.45%
Operating income growth under 50% of OR's 146.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
46.59%
Net income growth at 50-75% of OR's 75.34%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
45.11%
EPS growth at 50-75% of OR's 75.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
45.11%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of OR's 75.18%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.20%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
56.14%
FCF growth under 50% of OR's 762.13%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-199.08%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-304.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1.97%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OR is at 99.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-260.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-191.43%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
31.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 31.59% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
828.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 136.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
2217.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.50%
Debt growth far above OR's 0.73%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.