PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
73.96%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OR's 14.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
16.17%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.48%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.22%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-0.69%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-0.69%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.60%
Share count expansion well above OR's 0.65%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.59%
Diluted share change of 0.59% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.23%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
33.19%
FCF growth under 50% of OR's 129.85%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-458.46%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is at 49.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
27.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
46.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-2405.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
2.22%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
54.61%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1193.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 172.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-62.41%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.73%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. OR's 165599900.00%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
16.36%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.78%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
151.63%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.89%
SG&A growth well above OR's 84.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.