10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.52%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 6.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.08%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.70%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.70%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.34%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-97.04%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-460.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is at 126.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-292.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR stands at 47.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-35.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-376.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-91.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR is 106.99%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
54.61%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1898.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 7.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-34.44%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.30%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.38%
Asset growth above 1.5x OR's 8.96%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.21%
Under 50% of OR's 15.06%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
226.19%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.29%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 125.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.