10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.06%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 3.22%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
91.49%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
91.68%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.40%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
91.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.98%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.58%
Diluted share count expanding well above OR's 1.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.15%
OCF growth above 1.5x OR's 44.99%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
45.00%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.36%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 33.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
99.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 49.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
63.17%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 99.13%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
50.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
86.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
114.01%
Equity/share CAGR of 114.01% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
2306.49%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-38.56%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.67%
AR growth well above OR's 3.19%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.06%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
46.92%
Debt growth far above OR's 2.44%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.94%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.