10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.20%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
44.20%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
88.07%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
88.24%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
88.24%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.30%
OCF growth above 1.5x THM's 33.18%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
139.30%
FCF growth above 1.5x THM's 16.49%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
217.84%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
217.84%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
217.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 32.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
98.71%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
98.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
98.71%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-74.25%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 575.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-74.25%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 486.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-74.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 606.80%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.26%
AR growth well above THM's 76.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.24%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.77%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.21%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 227.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.