10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-212.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-694.18%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-685.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-685.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.96%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-30.32%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-151.71%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-151.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
13.47%
Below 50% of THM's 886.52%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.47%
Below 50% of THM's 1097.59%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.47%
Below 50% of THM's 1684.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.89%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. THM's 471.73%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-83.60%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.82%
Asset growth well under 50% of THM's 124.38%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.29%
Under 50% of THM's 73.43%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.00%
SG&A growth well above THM's 342.27%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.