PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.21%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
13.35%
Share count expansion well above THM's 6.97%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.35%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 11.92%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.78%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-144.35%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-482.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-482.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-482.18%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-40.18%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 1226.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-40.18%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 1568.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-40.18%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 69.65%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.79%
AR growth well above THM's 21.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.27%
Negative asset growth while THM invests at 40.97%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-28.20%
We have a declining book value while THM shows 33.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
SG&A declining or stable vs. THM's 510.95%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.