PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.35%
EBIT growth similar to THM's 60.40%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
60.35%
Operating income growth similar to THM's 60.65%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
60.48%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 48.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
60.51%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 52.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
60.51%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 48.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.09%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 4.63%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share change of 0.09% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.92%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
66.17%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.24%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-74.24%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-74.24%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-344.29%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-344.29%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-344.29%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-45.15%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 1101.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-45.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 1281.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-45.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 39.56%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.21%
AR growth well above THM's 31.66%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.61%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.86%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.