PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-42.30%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 13.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-44.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.64%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.12%
Share change of 0.12% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.12%
Diluted share change of 0.12% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.25%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
64.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x THM's 37.83%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-85.04%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-85.04%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
26.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-31.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 1782.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-31.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 140.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-39.45%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 90.87%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.72%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.84%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-6.96%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.30%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.