PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.45%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
44.45%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
44.46%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
44.44%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
44.44%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.03%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 7.19%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 7.19%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.67%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-81.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.07%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
38.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
85.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-98.58%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-98.58%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
88.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-34.68%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 2081.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-34.68%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 153.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-34.20%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 94.72%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 165.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of THM's 170.94%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.98%
Under 50% of THM's 227.13%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.45%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 87.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.