PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.64%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-56.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
18.61%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.89%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.89%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
100.92%
Share count expansion well above THM's 5.54%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
100.91%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 5.54%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.18%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
28.15%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.16%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
121.16%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
111.65%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
98.35%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
98.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.29%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-90.99%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 453.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-90.99%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-58.70%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.14%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-42.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.63%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.