PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.16%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 85.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-26.58%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 85.22%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-167.84%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 89.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-108.22%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 89.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-108.22%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 89.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-34.77%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-34.76%
Reduced diluted shares while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-415.56%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 89.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-94.65%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 89.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.47%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-7.47%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
81.13%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-14.60%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-14.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
71.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-60.24%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 444.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-60.24%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-29.57%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.69%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
47.81%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.58%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.