PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.77%
EBIT growth above 1.5x THM's 15.29%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
54.67%
Operating income growth above 1.5x THM's 15.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
58.77%
Net income growth at 50-75% of THM's 84.20%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
59.21%
EPS growth at 50-75% of THM's 84.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
59.21%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of THM's 84.30%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.13%
OCF growth above 1.5x THM's 16.93%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
6.15%
FCF growth under 50% of THM's 16.93%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
88.21%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
29.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
41.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 24.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
87.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to THM's 95.53%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-44.76%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 441.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.64%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-7.65%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.86%
We have a declining book value while THM shows 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.