PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.74%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-20.74%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 23.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.35%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.40%
OCF growth above 1.5x THM's 11.45%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
127.62%
FCF growth above 1.5x THM's 11.45%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.97%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
92.55%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
91.37%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-64.44%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
68.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
62.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 41.45%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-48.46%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 426.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-58.90%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-6.03%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.13%
Our AR growth while THM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.73%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.