PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-184.58%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 14.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-184.58%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 16.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1977.81%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 75.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2062.16%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1927.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 75.30%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.97%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.97%
Reduced diluted shares while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
271.60%
OCF growth above 1.5x THM's 41.43%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-86.88%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 41.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.73%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-67.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 48.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
131.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 131.43% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
29.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-5397.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 79.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-533.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-95.66%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 452.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-83.16%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-80.94%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 125.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.16%
Inventory growth of 100.16% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-48.88%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-65.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.69%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.