PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.95%
EBIT growth above 1.5x THM's 28.68%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
72.95%
Operating income growth above 1.5x THM's 28.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
96.12%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
96.25%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
96.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.98%
Share change of 0.98% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.98%
Diluted share change of 0.98% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.59%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 3.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1638.21%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.72%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
96.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
53.97%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-116.59%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 42.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
46.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of THM's 72.88%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-88.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 535.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-84.51%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-76.41%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.67%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. THM's 180.97%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-177.86%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.52%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-11.79%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.