PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 10.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.79%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 10.10%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3.78%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 59.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-3.33%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 59.22%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 59.22%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-771.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
4.55%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.53%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
28.76%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 9.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
71.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to THM's 78.05%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
39.29%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 23.39%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-83.91%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 459.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.82%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.79%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.98%
AR growth well above THM's 7.28%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
323.22%
Inventory growth of 323.22% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.94%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.57%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.