10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
170.79%
EBIT growth above 1.5x THM's 14.76%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
-120.49%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 14.76%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
45.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x THM's 18.20%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
46.77%
EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 18.49%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
46.77%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 18.49%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
13.36%
Share change of 13.36% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
13.36%
Diluted share change of 13.36% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.77%
OCF growth above 1.5x THM's 58.34%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
185.36%
FCF growth above 1.5x THM's 58.34%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 15.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-40.49%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 66.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
96.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 13.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
56.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of THM's 87.89%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-83.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 439.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-83.13%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.98%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
10.55%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-170.79%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.