PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-162.94%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 29.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-162.94%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 29.73%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
50.84%
Net income growth at 75-90% of THM's 61.53%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
66.67%
EPS growth similar to THM's 61.27%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
66.67%
Similar diluted EPS growth to THM's 61.27%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
25.71%
Share change of 25.71% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
25.72%
Diluted share change of 25.72% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-307.65%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 13.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-945.45%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 13.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
86.34%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 58.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
49.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to THM's 46.77%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
96.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
99.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 66.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
95.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to THM's 95.85%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-81.58%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 341.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-67.38%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-63.19%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.73%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
86.57%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.91%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.