10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-230.76%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 5.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-300.75%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 5.49%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-637.65%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 50.83%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-700.00%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 50.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-700.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 50.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.41%
OCF growth above 1.5x THM's 48.78%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
78.99%
FCF growth above 1.5x THM's 48.78%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.43%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
99.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 55.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
97.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 75.53%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
10.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
79.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to THM's 87.94%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
55.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of THM's 96.78%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.93%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 387.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.28%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-87.64%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-8.41%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-15.17%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.75%
SG&A growth well above THM's 0.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.