PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-289.55%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 25.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-289.55%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 25.96%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-72.32%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.63%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-571.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-397.57%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 15.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
87.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 87.21% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-174.49%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 97.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
96.83%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 76.30%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
71.57%
Net income/share CAGR of 71.57% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-92.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 97.50%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-98.24%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-92.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-80.46%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.61%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
289.27%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.