PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-791.83%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 31.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-378.80%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 30.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-794.40%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 27.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-800.00%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 48.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-800.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 48.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
81.05%
Share count expansion well above THM's 39.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
81.05%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 39.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-995.74%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1198.37%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.96%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 45.26%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-23.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-675.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 62.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
86.49%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 40.32% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-133.67%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
80.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 34.37%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-10.29%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
360.37%
Equity/share CAGR of 360.37% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
1969.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1743.91%
Asset growth above 1.5x THM's 36.17%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
929.49%
BV/share growth above 1.5x THM's 7.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
378.32%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.