PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.04%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.95%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
42.08%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
85.19%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
85.19%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
115.79%
Share change of 115.79% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
115.79%
Diluted share change of 115.79% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-84.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.26%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 53.14%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
9.01%
Below 50% of THM's 54.27%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-2134.26%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 59.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
38.65%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of THM's 62.36%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
28.63%
Below 50% of THM's 92.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-33.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 71.10%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
65.17%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
230.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1346.18%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-53.50%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.