10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.45%
Positive gross profit growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-134.00%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 25.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-164.76%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 26.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-132.54%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 22.86%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-129.31%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 24.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-133.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 22.89%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
34.28%
Share count expansion well above THM's 2.96%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
34.28%
Diluted share change of 34.28% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1030.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
18.55%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 59.16%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-85.27%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 87.45%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-155.93%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 36.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-130.76%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 81.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-101.36%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 84.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-6514.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
41.51%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
255.92%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
668.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.60%
AR growth of 7.60% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-25.21%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
20.12%
Similar asset growth to THM's 18.91%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-11.65%
We have a declining book value while THM shows 15.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.