PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.87%
Negative revenue growth while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-38.80%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.18%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 21.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.14%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 23.63%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.40%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 38.11%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-26.52%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 37.84%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 37.84%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.12%
Share count expansion well above THM's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.31%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 55.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-60.27%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 50.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.44%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of THM's 73.76%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-447.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 69.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-557.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 67.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
63.61%
Similar net income/share CAGR to THM's 67.02%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-884.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 61.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-384.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 65.08%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
34.53%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
697.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
271.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.46%
AR growth of 50.46% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
40.23%
Inventory growth of 40.23% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-0.41%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.99%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
30.13%
Debt growth of 30.13% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.02%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 111.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.