PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.98%
Positive gross profit growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-315.21%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-97.02%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 7.24%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-246.36%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 25.88%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-242.86%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 26.58%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-242.86%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 26.58%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.38%
Share count expansion well above THM's 1.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 1.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-848.72%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 49.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-29.48%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 49.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.17%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of THM's 83.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-9768.63%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 63.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-160.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 67.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-67.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 91.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-731.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 32.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-133.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 45.92%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
165.49%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1703.99%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-10.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
140.85%
AR growth of 140.85% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Negative asset growth while THM invests at 13.48%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.16%
We have a declining book value while THM shows 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.09%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.90%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.