PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5586.54%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x THM's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
46.96%
EBIT growth similar to THM's 47.57%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
52.67%
Operating income growth similar to THM's 49.27%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
47.48%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 38.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 38.82%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-312.37%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 38.82%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.68%
Share change of 3.68% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.67%
Diluted share change of 0.67% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-487.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-0.13%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-218.49%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-157.57%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 5.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
24.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-58.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
32.07%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x THM's 23.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
78.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
91.72%
Equity/share CAGR of 91.72% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-58.36%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
2.21%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10850.00%
AR growth of 10850.00% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.18%
Debt growth of 1.18% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.99%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.