PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.76%
Positive revenue growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
23.93%
Positive gross profit growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.05%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
105.71%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
110.12%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
95.24%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
105.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.91%
Share change of 14.91% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
8.53%
Diluted share change of 8.53% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.14%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.89%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3757.52%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 99.24%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
3723.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 25.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
607.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 10.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1680.79%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 98.89% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
431.09%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 49.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
297.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
581.22%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
14.40%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
81.95%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.40%
AR growth of 58.40% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
22.95%
Inventory growth of 22.95% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.76%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-13.89%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.