PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.92%
Revenue growth of 15.92% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
16.66%
Gross profit growth of 16.66% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
24.32%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
70.99%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-3.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.08%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.15%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
573.30%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
341.16%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 84.11%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
424.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
2558.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
748.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
246.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
506.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 5.19%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
461.51%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
22.94%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
96.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1524.69%
AR growth of 1524.69% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
8.52%
Inventory growth of 8.52% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
5.47%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.98%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.61%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 395.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.