PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.72%
Revenue growth of 1.72% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-6.23%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.86%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 46.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.23%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 50.36%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-58.14%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 51.61%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-57.75%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 52.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-59.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 52.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.14%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.64%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 0.26%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.40%
OCF growth under 50% of THM's 58.86%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.53%
FCF growth under 50% of THM's 58.86%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3068.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 92.64%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
319.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 57.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
388.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 14.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
329.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 91.38% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
147.34%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 46.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
150.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 37.63%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
487.89%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
28.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
108.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.83%
Inventory growth of 5.83% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.68%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.76%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.36%
Debt growth of 20.36% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.