PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth of 4.40% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
3.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of THM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-335.97%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 6.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1188.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1224.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1287.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Share change of 0.22% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-5.12%
Reduced diluted shares while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-19.23%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 82.26%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
175.98%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
756.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 65.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-18.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 64.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 24.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-456.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 64.31%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1373.63%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
74.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
81.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.55%
Inventory growth of 2.55% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-17.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.48%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.