PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.70%
Revenue growth of 25.70% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
40.49%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x THM's 0.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
65.42%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
51.02%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
39.40%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
38.22%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.03%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.92%
Share count expansion well above THM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.62%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 0.36%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.13%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
87.44%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638007.73%
5Y CAGR of 638007.73% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2559.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 75.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
922.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 17.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
91608.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 24.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1323.86%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 50.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
439.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 3.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2117.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 35.84%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1870.13%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
112.28%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
104.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.70%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.01%
Inventory growth of 0.01% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.74%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.12%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-10.98%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.87%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 144.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.