PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.43%
Revenue growth of 17.43% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
19.06%
Positive gross profit growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.76%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 55.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
51.47%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of THM's 93.86%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-12.86%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 53.39%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.50%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 54.17%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.31%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 54.17%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.72%
Share change of 0.72% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.48%
Diluted share change of 0.48% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
OCF growth under 50% of THM's 54.39%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.04%
FCF growth under 50% of THM's 54.39%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8402402.28%
5Y CAGR of 8402402.28% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1862.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 73.71%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
665.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 15.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1450.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 51.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2319.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 72.01% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
325.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 26.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
265.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 60.50%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1766.33%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
133.97%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
89.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.87%
AR growth of 17.87% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
0.60%
Inventory growth of 0.60% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.15%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.71%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.69%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.