PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.59%
Negative revenue growth while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.58%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.48%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-35.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.38%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
24.09%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.43%
Share change of 0.43% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-3.86%
Reduced diluted shares while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1645.54%
3Y CAGR of 1645.54% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
2483.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 69.54%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
820.83%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 11.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
301.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 55.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7066.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 66.38% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
378.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
500.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 8.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2935.48%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
134.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
111.82%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
AR growth of 4.55% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
1.33%
Inventory growth of 1.33% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.29%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
5.10%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-96.43%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
SG&A declining or stable vs. THM's 1637.45%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.