PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Revenue growth of 51.64% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
20.77%
Gross profit growth of 20.77% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-180.56%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 28.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
72.34%
Operating income growth above 1.5x THM's 35.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-367.69%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 30.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-368.62%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 31.25%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-381.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 31.25%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 1.45%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 1.45%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x THM's 4.57%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-1121.77%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 4.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
3Y CAGR of 195.30% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
14434.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 67.05%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
3412.29%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 33.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-47476.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 39.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-297.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-409.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 10.10%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1023.12%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
137.82%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
80.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
AR growth of 79.13% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
120.96%
Inventory growth of 120.96% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
203.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x THM's 5.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-12.48%
We have a declining book value while THM shows 4.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19103.99%
Debt growth of 19103.99% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.