10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.35%
EBIT growth of 60.35% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
60.35%
Operating income growth of 60.35% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
60.48%
Net income growth of 60.48% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
60.51%
EPS growth of 60.51% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
60.51%
Diluted EPS growth of 60.51% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.09%
Share change of 0.09% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.09%
Diluted share change of 0.09% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.92%
OCF growth of 34.92% while Gold is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
66.17%
FCF growth of 66.17% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.24%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-74.24%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-74.24%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-344.29%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Gold median of 26.11%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-344.29%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Gold median is 38.22%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-344.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 25.24%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-45.15%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-45.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-45.15%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.21%
AR growth of 41.21% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
Assets shrink while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.61%
Negative BV/share change while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.86%
SG&A decline while Gold grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.