10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.04%
EBIT growth of 42.04% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
-0.95%
Negative operating income growth while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
42.08%
Net income growth of 42.08% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
85.19%
EPS growth of 85.19% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
85.19%
Diluted EPS growth of 85.19% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
115.79%
Share change of 115.79% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
115.79%
Diluted share change of 115.79% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.30%
Negative OCF growth while Gold median is -6.02%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-84.97%
Negative FCF growth while Gold median is -0.20%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.26%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 74.01%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
9.01%
Below 50% of Gold median. Jim Chanos would question the firm’s ability to convert sales into real cash in the mid-term.
-2134.26%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Gold median is 12.66%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
38.65%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Gold median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
28.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR near Gold median. Charlie Munger might see standard mid-cycle performance in a healthy sector.
-33.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Gold median is 35.04%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
65.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 65.17% while Gold median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
230.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while Gold median is negative. Peter Lynch sees an advantage over struggling peers in capital accumulation.
1346.18%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Gold is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.48%
Assets shrink while Gold median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-53.50%
Negative BV/share change while Gold median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
SG&A growth far above Gold median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.