PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.10%
G&A change of 32.10% while CGAU maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
519.05%
Marketing expense change of 519.05% while CGAU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-22.96%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
44.16%
Operating expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.16%
Total costs growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.91%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.98%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9473686.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.76%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-34.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.66%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.66%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.81%
Share count change of 38.81% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
38.81%
Diluted share change of 38.81% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.