PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.59%
G&A reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-88.13%
Marketing expense reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
2.16%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-60.35%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-60.35%
Total costs reduction while CGAU shows 13.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.24%
D&A growth above 1.5x CGAU's 1.87%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
60.90%
EBITDA growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.35%
Operating income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 1912.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
60.34%
Pre-tax income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.47%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
60.48%
Net income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.51%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 0.18%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.