10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.61%
G&A reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
66.70%
Marketing expense change of 66.70% while CGAU maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.05%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-65.05%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.05%
EBITDA growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 1980.03%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
64.12%
Pre-tax income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.15%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x CGAU's 63.53%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-0.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.50%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.90%
Share count change of 14.90% while CGAU is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
14.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CGAU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.