10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.13%
G&A growth while CGAU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
96.57%
Marketing expense growth while CGAU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.58%
Operating expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.58%
Total costs growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.16%
EBITDA decline while CGAU shows 261.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.58%
Operating income decline while CGAU shows 195.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.51%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 98.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-174.46%
Pre-tax income decline while CGAU shows 189.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-167.84%
Net income decline while CGAU shows 175.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.22%
EPS decline while CGAU shows 175.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-108.22%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 172.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.77%
Share count reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-34.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.