PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x CGAU's 9.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-40.42%
Gross profit decline while CGAU shows 60.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.59%
G&A growth while CGAU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-15.05%
Marketing expense reduction while CGAU shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
4.15%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 100.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
28.61%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x CGAU's 24.64%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
28.62%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CGAU's 12.66%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
57.87%
Interest expense growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.42%
D&A growth above 1.5x CGAU's 18.05%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-18.69%
EBITDA decline while CGAU shows 272.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.01%
Operating income decline while CGAU shows 3797.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2113.17%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 93.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.77%
Pre-tax income decline while CGAU shows 2821.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
368.72%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.77%
Net income decline while CGAU shows 15555.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.83%
EPS decline while CGAU shows 15617.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.75%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 15272.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.56%
Share count reduction while CGAU shows 0.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.56%
Diluted share reduction while CGAU shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.