PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.58%
Revenue growth below 50% of CGAU's 6.78%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
7.83%
Cost increase while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.29%
Gross profit decline while CGAU shows 5226.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.80%
Margin decline while CGAU shows 4901.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
G&A reduction while CGAU shows 1.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
174.36%
Similar other expenses growth to CGAU's 230.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
73.66%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 913.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
31.47%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CGAU's 11.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.33%
Interest expense growth 1.1-1.25x CGAU's 7.54%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
13.22%
D&A growth while CGAU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.19%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
106.70%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CGAU's 9.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
64.83%
Pre-tax income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.42%
Tax expense reduction while CGAU shows 909.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1589.95%
Net income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1552.48%
Net margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1412.50%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1350.00%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.52%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.15%
Diluted share increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.