10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.92%
Positive growth while CGAU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.67%
Cost increase while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
16.66%
Gross profit growth below 50% of CGAU's 105.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.63%
Margin expansion below 50% of CGAU's 152.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.83%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
8.77%
Total costs growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.91%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
16.33%
D&A growth while CGAU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.56%
EBITDA growth below 50% of CGAU's 45.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.73%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of CGAU's 88.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
70.99%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 52.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
47.50%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 41.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-244.28%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
31.80%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of CGAU's 49.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
13.70%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CGAU's 37.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
130.66%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.08%
Net income decline while CGAU shows 45.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.39%
Net margin decline while CGAU shows 33.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Diluted EPS decline while CGAU shows 47.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.08%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.15%
Diluted share increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.