PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.88%
Positive growth while CGAU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.49%
Cost increase while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.72%
Positive growth while CGAU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.08%
Margin decline while CGAU shows 0.32% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.80%
G&A growth while CGAU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.92%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-28.63%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.36%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.84%
Interest expense growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.48%
D&A growth while CGAU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
196.24%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 92.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
190.05%
EBITDA margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.41%
Operating income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.14%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 1.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.53%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 270.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
155.55%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CGAU's 818.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
151.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of CGAU's 945.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
65.95%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
129.78%
Net income growth below 50% of CGAU's 324.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
127.87%
Net margin growth below 50% of CGAU's 355.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
129.05%
EPS growth below 50% of CGAU's 321.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
128.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of CGAU's 314.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.19%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.18%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CGAU's 1.62%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.