10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.70%
Positive growth while CGAU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.67%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x CGAU's 4.70%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
40.49%
Positive growth while CGAU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
11.77%
Margin expansion while CGAU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.07%
G&A reduction while CGAU shows 8.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
32.58%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 105.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
10.48%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CGAU's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.96%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CGAU's 4.37%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.04%
Interest expense growth less than half of CGAU's 12.76%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.68%
D&A growth less than half of CGAU's 145.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
52.32%
EBITDA growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.18%
EBITDA margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.02%
Operating income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.14%
Operating margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1409.26%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.45%
Pre-tax income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.82%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.40%
Net income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.90%
Net margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.22%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.03%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.92%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.62%
Diluted share increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.