PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.59%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.74%
Cost reduction while CGAU shows 2.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.58%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
G&A growth while CGAU reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.20%
Other expenses reduction while CGAU shows 352.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-10.44%
Operating expenses reduction while CGAU shows 260.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.74%
Total costs reduction while CGAU shows 53.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.30%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.66%
EBITDA margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-35.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
151.24%
Other expenses growth less than half of CGAU's 4187.83%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.04%
Pre-tax income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.58%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
23.38%
Net income growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.08%
Net margin growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.09%
EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.58%
Diluted EPS growth while CGAU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.43%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.86%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.