10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
90.58%
Positive growth while CGAU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
94.02%
Cost increase while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
81.32%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 14.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.86%
Margin decline while CGAU shows 18.66% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.30%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-37.70%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
54.52%
Total costs growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
456.58%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CGAU's 5.53%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
141.56%
D&A growth above 1.5x CGAU's 8.07%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
705.60%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 15.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
417.76%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 20.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
56.24%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 31.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-18.02%
Operating margin decline while CGAU shows 36.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
81.20%
Other expenses growth while CGAU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
306.85%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 20.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
208.54%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x CGAU's 24.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
60.09%
Tax expense growth while CGAU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
169.04%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 125.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
136.23%
Similar net margin growth to CGAU's 133.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
168.18%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x CGAU's 120.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
159.09%
Similar diluted EPS growth to CGAU's 146.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.78%
Share count increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.22%
Diluted share increase while CGAU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.