PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.76%
Growth of 15.76% while DC shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
1.95%
Cost growth of 1.95% while DC maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
23.93%
Growth of 23.93% while DC shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
7.06%
Margin change of 7.06% while DC shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
G&A growth while DC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.96%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.76%
Operating expenses reduction while DC shows 6.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.71%
Total costs reduction while DC shows 6.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.23%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-78.53%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
40.53%
EBITDA growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.39%
Margin change of 21.39% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
105.71%
Operating income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.70%
Margin change of 77.70% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-1117.48%
Other expenses reduction while DC shows 246.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.73%
Pre-tax income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.34%
Margin change of 10.34% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-39.31%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
110.12%
Net income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.51%
Margin change of 81.51% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
95.24%
EPS growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.00%
Diluted EPS growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.91%
Share count increase while DC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.53%
Diluted share increase while DC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.