10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.43%
Growth of 17.43% while DC shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
14.49%
Cost growth of 14.49% while DC maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
19.06%
Growth of 19.06% while DC shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
1.39%
Margin change of 1.39% while DC shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
G&A growth while DC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.20%
Other expenses change of 105.20% while DC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
62.19%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x DC's 10.88%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
27.63%
Total costs growth above 1.5x DC's 10.88%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-21.72%
Interest expense reduction while DC shows 21.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.79%
D&A growth while DC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.70%
EBITDA growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.54%
EBITDA margin decline while DC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.47%
Operating income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.99%
Margin change of 28.99% while DC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-373.34%
Other expenses reduction while DC shows 97.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.13%
Pre-tax income growth while DC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.73%
Pre-tax margin decline while DC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.08%
Tax expense growth while DC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.79%
Net margin decline while DC shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.31%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.72%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x DC's 6.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.48%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x DC's 6.49%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.